Amateur Burn-Out?
In a recent post Chris Anderson, editor of Wired magazine and author of The Long Tail, discusses amateurism vs. professionalism. He maintains that amateurs are more passionate about what they do than professionals. According to Anderson they are merely driven by intrinsic motivation, else they stop doing what they just do. His key argument runs like that:
Amateurs self-select for the job. Professionals are selected. For most jobs, volunteers beat draftees.
I think this a rather short-sighted view. Indeed, most amateurs volunteer for what they do in the first place but they don’t do it always for mere enthusiasm. Most of the time they form part of a group of like-minded people so there is a kind of “social factor” involved. But these social incentives are not for granted and they aren’t delivered on a regular basis. Yet, when the enthusiasm is gone and the social rewards are missing many may still hang on, not because a nasty boss tells them to do so but because of the awareness of imminent “social punishment”.
On the other hand, dedicated professionals may suffer periods of fatigue but through the continuity of rewards and the consciousness of being selected for what they do over others with similar skills and ambitions they still manage to produce value.
Oh, and I’m not belittling the ones over the others, I just think not everything that is created as free self-exploit can be rated higher than paid exploit by others.